Ben Parr at Mahable:
Facebook will launch its long-awaited iPad app at Apple’s iPhone 5 launch event on Oct. 4, Mashable has learned. In addition to the iPad app, Facebook is also expected to release a revamped version of its iPhone app and may unveil an HTML5-based mobile app marketplace.
Robert Scoble hinted at this a few days back and Mashable are now confirming it. It would seem that Facebook are going to be invited to release their new iPad app as part of Apple’s iPhone 5 announcement next week.
Apple and Facebook are known to have had quite a big fall out and really don’t like each other. So this is a pretty big turnaround.
Hmmm. I’ve been playing around with the Facebook privacy settings. In short, they’re broken. (This isn’t an observation about whether they’re appropriate or good, it is purely about functionality.)
I use various apps that are connected to Facebook which post on my behalf. For example, I take photos on the Camera+ app on my iPhone and that app can then post photos to my albums and wall.
Anyway, I went to the app settings and set most of them to post to friends only and a couple to post publicly. But here’s the problem: they don’t do what you tell them to. My Camera+ app is set to post to friends only, but it has been posting publicly.
It seems that the apps don’t operate independently of the master privacy setting. So, if the master setting is to post to public by default (which I’m sure I’ve switched to friends only at least two times now…hmmm), then that overrides the individual settings on the apps.
So it appears that there is no customisation working at the moment. Which is feeble. Let’s hope they fix this soon.
I tried it the other way around too. I set my master setting to friends only (again) and then posted a link via the Reeder app on my iPhone which I set up to post publicly. The result? It only posted to friends.
Rubbish. I’m sorry Facebook, but in matters of privacy, you just can’t have bugs like this.

Facebook are in the process of rolling out another new redesign to its site. My first thought is that it feels very cluttered.
My eyes are being drawn to too many places at the same time. Should I look at the new ‘ticker’, the ‘recent stories’, the ‘from earlier today’ posts, the ‘people to subscribe to’ suggestions, the sponsored links, the birthday and events notifications, or the list of people online?
It feels like too much.
On a related note, I also still think that the font size is too small for the core Facebook text.
I actually think that Google+ has got a much better design than Facebook. The layout and font sizing is much more pleasing on the eye and doesn’t have the same clutter issues that Facebook is struggling with.

It seems that Facebook are copying a lot of Google+ features, maybe someone could suggest they start copying some of the look and feel too.

I like the look of this new site called If This Then That (IFTTT). In theory it is everything I’m looking for. I have blog posts and links that I like to share across various different platforms ranging from Google+ to Facebook to Twitter. And so this seems ideal. Sadly though, it still doesn’t do enough for me.
I said in theory above because, in reality, I’m very pernickety when it comes to social sharing. I want everything to look just right for the platform that I’m sharing on. And that typically requires a level of customisation that simply isn’t available with IFTTT or any of the cross platform social sharing tools.
So, after spending a bit of time playing around with it, I’m going to stick to manually posting all the content I want to share on each of the different platforms I engage with.
For others, I can imagine this being a really useful tool so I do definitely recommend giving it a try. It could definitely save you some time.
► Add your comments on Google+
If you don’t yet have Google+, use this link to subscribe.
I’ve been using Google+ for about two weeks now and have now formed few more established thoughts about it.
Those of you who know me or have added me to your circles will know that I have been very positive about it. I like it, I really do. I think it brings together the best of the worlds of both Twitter and Facebook: I can share privately to family and friends, but I can also share publicly to anyone who chooses to follow me (and anything else in between depending on the circles I create and share with).
So I do genuinely feel that Google+ has a real shot at success as a major player in the social networking scene. I don’t expect it to wipe out Twitter or Facebook any time soon - but I do think it will make some serious inroads.
That said, I still think that a lot of people will struggle to see a compelling reason to transition to or even setup a Google+ profile. There are two types of people in the world: those who love meeting new people, and those who are happy with the friends and family they already have.
If you’re on Facebook happily sharing with your established family and friends, why would you move to Google+ to do the same thing (in a slightly different way) with the very same people?
This is why - initially at least - I think it will be people from Twitter who transition to Google+ much more naturally than your average, non Twitter using Facebook user.
People on Twitter are used to meeting new people and following people they don’t know. Facebook users only connect with people they know. And there will be a lot of Facebook users trying out Google+, seeing hardly anyone they know there (yet), and not knowing what to do. That is a big hurdle that Google+ has to overcome.
I do think the future is bright for Google+, and it is already taking off faster than any other social network in history. But for people who are only interested in connecting with people they already know, the barriers to entry are very high.
Comments
Please post any comments over on Google+ (if you need an invite, leave me your email address here).
New York Times:
People briefed on Facebook’s plans say that in coming weeks the company plans to introduce a free iPad application that has been carefully designed and optimized for the tablet.
I’ve no idea what they’ve been playing at but it would seem that the waiting is over. There’ll soon be a proper Facebook app for the iPad, just like there is for the iPhone.
Stuart Dredge in The Guardian:
More than 6.4 million people in the UK used the Google Maps mobile app in April 2011, according to new research published by comScore and mobile industry body the GSMA. That made it the most popular connected app in the UK, with Yahoo Weather (3.6 million) edging Facebook (3.5 million) into third place.
The whole article is worth a read to see the full list.
The Economist looks into the companies that seem best placed to stand the test of time:
Apple, Amazon and Facebook look like good long-term bets. Dell, Cisco and Microsoft do not. The jury is out on Oracle and Google.
Worth a look. Interesting to read the reasons.
Inside Facebook:
The United States lost nearly 6 million users, falling from 155.2 million at the start of May to 149.4 million at the end of it. This is the first time the country has lost users in the past year. Canada also fell significantly, by 1.52 million down to 16.6 million, although it has been fluctuating around that number for the past year. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom, Norway and Russia all posted losses of more than 100,000.
Whilst Facebook is still growing as a whole, the nations that were the first to jump on board are starting to see a slowdown. Has Facebook maybe peaked for people in the US and the UK?
I’m very much still a user of Facebook, though not nearly as much nowadays. I cross-post my status updates from Twitter and share the links to my KERUFF posts but, other than that, I don’t use it much. There are a few people whose updates I follow but I have blocked huge numbers of my Facebook ‘friends’ from appearing in my feed.
For me, Twitter definitely has the larger proportion of my time. I discover much more interesting stuff through Twitter and it’s a much simpler approach.
I won’t be leaving Facebook behind any time soon, but these stats - though not yet a trend - don’t surprise me at all.
After revealing that the company who hired a PR company to plant negative stories about Google in the press is Facebook, Dan Lyons reflects on the implications:
It’s hard to say whether Google will ever be able to crack Facebook’s grip on social networking. But after this sorry, clumsy episode, Facebook no longer seems so invincible. In fact, they almost seem a little bit afraid.
No matter how this gets spun, it’s really shoddy behaviour by Facebook.
MG Siegler at TechCrunch:
A Facebook-built iPad app would be the most popular app on the device without question. It would be installed on nearly every device out there. It’s time for Facebook to stop playing around and build the damn thing.
Totally agree. No idea what on earth Facebook are playing at.
Facebook adds ‘Question’ option to newsfeed posts.
It’ll be interesting to see how many people use this.
Jason Hiner:
Page needs to remember the mission that made Google great - organizing the world’s information. He needs to re-energize the troops around that goal, launch an all-out assault on SEO spam, and keep from getting distracted by Facebook. The task of digitizing the world’s data is far from complete — even just the public data. If Google can pull off more private-public partnerships like the one it’s doing in Kansas City, Kansas for high speed fiber broadband than it can help also bring a lot more valuable information to the Web — from libraries to public documents to historical archives to government data, for example. This is a service for the Internet community and it enhances Google’s business model by allowing people to use Google search for even more services.
In short, stay focussed. Google feels like a company that is all over the place at the moment and has lost any clear, coherent sense of its reason for existence. If Page can bring that back, then that’ll be very, very good news for Google - and indeed us all.